Estimation and Forecasting of Excitation Force for Arrays of Wave Energy Devices

To maximize energy conversion, real-time control of a wave energy converter (WEC) requires knowledge of the present and future excitation force (F ex ) acting on the device, which is a nonmeasurable quantity. The problem of estimation and forecasting of F ex becomes more challenging when arrays of W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on sustainable energy 2018-10, Vol.9 (4), p.1672-1680
Hauptverfasser: Pena-Sanchez, Yerai, Garcia-Abril, Marina, Paparella, Francesco, Ringwood, John V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To maximize energy conversion, real-time control of a wave energy converter (WEC) requires knowledge of the present and future excitation force (F ex ) acting on the device, which is a nonmeasurable quantity. The problem of estimation and forecasting of F ex becomes more challenging when arrays of WECs are considered, due to the hydrodynamic interactions in the array. In this paper, a global F ex estimator for a complete WEC array is developed and compared to a set of independent estimators, which utilize information local only to each device. A significant question is whether the array of measurements is sufficient to compensate for the greater complexity of the wave field, compared to the isolated body case. The paper shows that the global estimator is always more accurate than the independent estimator, improving up to 45% the estimation accuracy of the independent estimator. Regarding prediction, two different F ex forecasters for a WEC array are compared: a global forecaster, utilizing F ex estimates from the full set of array devices, and an independent forecaster, utilizing only a local F ex estimate. We demonstrate that the global forecaster achieves more accurate results, not only compared to the independent forecaster, but also compared to the isolated body case.
ISSN:1949-3029
1949-3037
DOI:10.1109/TSTE.2018.2807880