Placement and Sizing of Inverter-Based Renewable Systems in Multi-Phase Distribution Networks

This paper develops a tractable formulation for optimal placement and sizing of inverter-based renewable systems in multi-phase distribution networks. The goal of the formulation is to minimize the cost of inverter installation, average power import, and average distributed generation curtailment. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2019-03, Vol.34 (2), p.918-930
Hauptverfasser: Bazrafshan, Mohammadhafez, Gatsis, Nikolaos, Dall'Anese, Emiliano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper develops a tractable formulation for optimal placement and sizing of inverter-based renewable systems in multi-phase distribution networks. The goal of the formulation is to minimize the cost of inverter installation, average power import, and average distributed generation curtailment. Three-phase and single-phase inverter models are presented that preserve the underlying mappings between renewable uncertainty to power injection. The uncertainty of distributed generators (DGs) and loads are characterized by a finite set of scenarios. Linear multi-phase power flow approximations are used in conjunction with scenario reduction techniques to arrive at a tractable two-stage stochastic formulation for optimal DG placement and sizing. First-stage decisions are locations for DG deployment and capacity sizes, and second-stage decisions include DG real power curtailment, reactive power support, as well as feeder voltage profile. The resulting formulation is a mixed-integer second-order cone program and can be solved efficiently either by existing optimization solvers or by relaxing the binary variables to the [0,1] interval. Simulation studies on standard multi-phase IEEE test feeders promise that optimal stochastic planning of DGs reduces costs during validation, compared to a scheme where uncertainty is only represented by its average value.
ISSN:0885-8950
1558-0679
DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2871377