Reconciliation of methods of compensation for PSSs in multimachine systems

Several methods for the design of compensation for power system stabilizers (PSSs) are used in practice. The object of this paper is to reconcile the methods and explore their relative advantages and disadvantages. Three methods are investigated: the GEP and the P-Vr frequency response approaches, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2004-02, Vol.19 (1), p.463-472
Hauptverfasser: Gibbard, M.J., Vowles, D.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Several methods for the design of compensation for power system stabilizers (PSSs) are used in practice. The object of this paper is to reconcile the methods and explore their relative advantages and disadvantages. Three methods are investigated: the GEP and the P-Vr frequency response approaches, and the method of residues. It is shown the phase response of a modified GEP transfer function (TF) agrees closely with that of the P-Vr TF, thus providing the basis for the design of a robust PSS. Residues yield only a limited number of phase angles that can be used with confidence for design purposes and are consistent with the P-Vr phase response. The remaining residues for rotor modes are affected by variability of participation factor angles and interactions from other machines. Unlike other methods, the P-Vr approach yields magnitude and phase information that simplifies the synthesis of the PSS TF and yields a robust stabilizer.
ISSN:0885-8950
1558-0679
DOI:10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820689