Transmission loss allocation: a comparison of different practical algorithms
A pool-operated electricity market based on hourly auctions usually neglects network constraints and network losses while applying its market-clearing mechanism. This mechanism determines the accepted and nonaccepted energy bids as well as the hourly market-clearing prices. As a result, ex post proc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power systems 2002-08, Vol.17 (3), p.571-576 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A pool-operated electricity market based on hourly auctions usually neglects network constraints and network losses while applying its market-clearing mechanism. This mechanism determines the accepted and nonaccepted energy bids as well as the hourly market-clearing prices. As a result, ex post procedures are needed to resolve network congestions and to allocate transmission losses to generators and demands. This paper focuses on transmission loss allocation procedures and provides a detailed comparison of four alternative algorithms: (1) pro rata (PR); (2) marginal allocation; (3) unsubsidized marginal allocation; and (4) proportional sharing. A case study based on the IEEE RTS is provided. Different load scenarios covering a whole year are analyzed. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are stated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-8950 1558-0679 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.800894 |