ψ-Net: Stacking Densely Convolutional LSTMs for Sub-Cortical Brain Structure Segmentation

Sub-cortical brain structure segmentation is of great importance for diagnosing neuropsychiatric disorders. However, developing an automatic approach to segmenting sub-cortical brain structures remains very challenging due to the ambiguous boundaries, complex anatomical structures, and large varianc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2020-09, Vol.39 (9), p.2806-2817
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Lihao, Hu, Xiaowei, Zhu, Lei, Fu, Chi-Wing, Qin, Jing, Heng, Pheng-Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sub-cortical brain structure segmentation is of great importance for diagnosing neuropsychiatric disorders. However, developing an automatic approach to segmenting sub-cortical brain structures remains very challenging due to the ambiguous boundaries, complex anatomical structures, and large variance of shapes. This paper presents a novel deep network architecture, namely \Psi -Net, for sub-cortical brain structure segmentation, aiming at selectively aggregating features and boosting the information propagation in a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). To achieve this, we first formulate a densely convolutional LSTM module (DC-LSTM) to selectively aggregate the convolutional features with the same spatial resolution at the same stage of a CNN . This helps to promote the discriminativeness of features at each CNN stage. Second, we stack multiple DC-LSTMs from the deepest stage to the shallowest stage to progressively enrich low-level feature maps with high-level context. We employ two benchmark datasets on sub-cortical brain structure segmentation, and perform various experiments to evaluate the proposed \Psi -Net. The experimental results show that our network performs favorably against the state-of-the-art methods on both benchmark datasets.
ISSN:0278-0062
1558-254X
DOI:10.1109/TMI.2020.2975642