myOLAP: An Approach to Express and Evaluate OLAP Preferences

Multidimensional databases are the core of business intelligence systems. Their users express complex OLAP queries, often returning large volumes of facts, sometimes providing little or no information. Thus, expressing preferences could be highly valuable in this domain. The OLAP domain is represent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 2011-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1050-1064
Hauptverfasser: Golfarelli, M., Rizzi, S., Biondi, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Multidimensional databases are the core of business intelligence systems. Their users express complex OLAP queries, often returning large volumes of facts, sometimes providing little or no information. Thus, expressing preferences could be highly valuable in this domain. The OLAP domain is representative of an unexplored class of preference queries, characterized by three peculiarities: preferences can be expressed on both numerical and categorical domains; they can also be expressed on the aggregation level of facts; the space on which preferences are expressed includes both elemental and aggregated facts. In this paper, we present myOLAP, an approach for expressing and evaluating OLAP preferences, devised by taking into account the three peculiarities above. We first propose a preference algebra where users are enabled to express their preferences, besides on attributes and measures, also on the aggregation level of facts, for instance, by stating that monthly data are preferred to yearly and daily data. Then, with respect to preference evaluation, we propose an algorithm called WeSt that relies on a novel graph representation where two types of domination between sets of facts may be expressed, which considerably improves efficiency. The approach is extensively tested for efficiency and effectiveness on real data, and compared against two other approaches in the literature.
ISSN:1041-4347
1558-2191
DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2010.196