Wireless Sensor Network Configuration-Part II: Adaptive Coverage for Decentralized Algorithms
This is the second of a two-part investigation of the generation of wireless sensor network (WSN) configurations that: 1) maximize coverage of irregular shaped polygonal areas and 2) maintain a high degree of node connectivity. The first-part of the investigation presented centralized algorithms for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on industrial informatics 2013-08, Vol.9 (3), p.1728-1738 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This is the second of a two-part investigation of the generation of wireless sensor network (WSN) configurations that: 1) maximize coverage of irregular shaped polygonal areas and 2) maintain a high degree of node connectivity. The first-part of the investigation presented centralized algorithms for the generation of mesh (wireless sensor) network configurations that maximize coverage and connectivity. In this second part, we present a decentralized and distributed approach using an Extended Virtual Spring Mesh (EVSM)-Adaptive Coverage Algorithm and Protocol (ACAP) algorithm. The EVSM-ACAP algorithm represents an extension of EVSM algorithm with the newly developed ACAP. ACAP provides adaptive coverage and configuration of the mesh network by dynamically adjusting the sensing range of sensor nodes. EVSM-ACAP is compared to centralized mesh generation algorithms (described in the part one of the investigation), as well as other decentralized algorithms from artificial physics, for the control of large numbers of physical agents in sensor networks. EVSM-ACAP is shown to produce a sensor network deployment with an average sensor spacing within 1.6% of the desired spacing, versus 5.75% for the best centralized algorithmic approach. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these centralized mesh network configuration algorithms have been contrasted with the scalable, robust, decentralized algorithms of artificial physics and EVSM. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1551-3203 1941-0050 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TII.2013.2245907 |