Range Difference Between Shallow and Deep Channels of Airborne Bathymetry LiDAR With Segmented Field-of-View Receivers

Significant range differences were identified between shallow and deep channels of the Mapper5000 bathymetry light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system with segmented field-of-view (FOV) receivers. Range difference varied with depth and water optical properties. The main feature was the maximum valu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2022, Vol.60, p.1-16
Hauptverfasser: Li, Jizhe, Tao, Bangyi, He, Yan, Li, Youzhi, Huang, Haiqing, Mao, Zhihua, Yu, Jiayong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Significant range differences were identified between shallow and deep channels of the Mapper5000 bathymetry light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system with segmented field-of-view (FOV) receivers. Range difference varied with depth and water optical properties. The main feature was the maximum value in range difference curves, which ranged from 0.3 to 0.6 m and usually exceeded the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) accuracy standards. Sensitivity analyses based on a semianalytical Monte Carlo simulation model revealed that the scattering phase function and laser beam divergence angle played more important roles in causing pulse dispersion and determining the amplitude and position of maximum range difference than absorption and scattering coefficients. A range difference correction method by fitting existing shallow and deep channel data in the overlapping range with a cubic polynomial was proposed to correct the deep channel data in the entire depth range that LiDAR can detect. Depth discontinuity at the junction of the shallow channel and deep channel measurements was successfully removed, and the mean and standard deviation of corrected range differences were within 0.01 and 0.1 m, respectively. A combination of range difference correction and mean bias corrector can be an alternative method for depth bias correction of segmented-FOV LiDAR when referenced sonar data is not available.
ISSN:0196-2892
1558-0644
DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2022.3172351