Resolution versus Speckle Relative to Geologic Interpretability of Spaceborne Radar Images: A Survey of User Preference
A survey was conducted to evaluate user preference for resolution versus speckle relative to the geologic interpretability of spaceborne radar images. Thirteen different resolution/looks combinations were simulated from Seasat synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data of each of three test sites. The SAR...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 1982-10, Vol.GE-20 (4), p.434-444 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A survey was conducted to evaluate user preference for resolution versus speckle relative to the geologic interpretability of spaceborne radar images. Thirteen different resolution/looks combinations were simulated from Seasat synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data of each of three test sites. The SAR images were distributed with questionnarires for analysis by eighty-five earth scientists. The relative discriminability of geologic targets at each test site for each simulation of resolution and speckle on the images is determined here from a survey of the evaluations. A large majority of the analysts indicate that for most targets a two-look image at the highest simulated resolution is best. For a constant data rate a higher resolution is more important for target discrimination than a greater number of looks. Sand dunes require more looks than other geologic targets. Multiple-look images are preferred over the corresponding single-look image at all resolutions. The number of multiple looks that is optimal for discriminating geologic logic targets is in general inversely related to the simulated resolution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-2892 1558-0644 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TGRS.1982.350409 |