A Simple Analysis on the Function of the Conductive Particles in the Insulator Voltage-Sustaining Layer for Power Devices

The function of conductive particles on the insulator for a simple case is analyzed in this paper. In a certain insulator containing conductive particles, the electric dipoles in the conductive particles are induced by the external electric field, and the polarization orientation is along the direct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on electron devices 2018-04, Vol.65 (4), p.1427-1431
Hauptverfasser: Li, Huan, Lyu, Xinjiang, Chen, Xing Bi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The function of conductive particles on the insulator for a simple case is analyzed in this paper. In a certain insulator containing conductive particles, the electric dipoles in the conductive particles are induced by the external electric field, and the polarization orientation is along the direction of electric field. Macroscopically, the insulator containing conductive particles can be equivalent to a high-permittivity ( \varepsilon _{\textsf {eff}} ) insulator. Meanwhile, the maximum electric field ( {E}_{\textsf {max}} ) in the insulator containing conductive particles is enhanced. The \varepsilon _{\textsf {eff}} and {E}_{\textsf {max}} are determined not only by the geometric shape, size, and the packing modes of conductive particles. This paper presents several packing modes of conductive particles in the insulator. Simulation results indicate that when cubic conductive particles with side length 2{R} are stacked in the form of cubic close packing, the \varepsilon _{\textsf {eff}} and the {E}_{\textsf {max}} of the insulator containing conductive particles at \textit {R/d} = \textsf {0.495} (d is the distance between the centers of the mass of closet conductive particles) are increased to 67.1 times and 97.5 times, respectively, compared with the insulator without conductive particles inside.
ISSN:0018-9383
1557-9646
DOI:10.1109/TED.2018.2805313