On the bit-error probability of differentially encoded QPSK and offset QPSK in the presence of carrier synchronization
We investigate the differences between allowable differential encoding strategies and their associated bit-error probability performances for quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) and offset QPSK modulations when the carrier demodulation reference signals are supplied by the optimum (motivated by max...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on communications 2006-05, Vol.54 (5), p.806-812 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We investigate the differences between allowable differential encoding strategies and their associated bit-error probability performances for quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) and offset QPSK modulations when the carrier demodulation reference signals are supplied by the optimum (motivated by maximum a posteriori estimation of carrier phase) carrier-tracking loop suitable for that modulation. In particular, we show that in the presence of carrier-synchronization phase ambiguity but an otherwise ideal loop, both the symbol and bit-error probabilities in the presence of differential encoding are identical for the two modulations. On the other hand, when in addition the phase error introduced by the loop's finite signal-to-noise ratio is taken into account, it is shown that the two differentially encoded modulations behave differently, and their performances are no longer equivalent. A similar statement has previously been demonstrated for the same modulations when the phase ambiguity was assumed to have been perfectly resolved by means other than differential encoding. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-6778 1558-0857 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TCOMM.2006.874002 |