Analysis of the Effect of Common Disturbances on the Safety of a Wearable Tremor Suppression Device

The advent of wearable technology has enabled a large number of externally worn mechatronic devices to be developed and tested on people with movement disorders. The complexity of these disorders and the variety of conditions across different patients have resulted in a pressing demand for the incor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE robotics and automation letters 2021-04, Vol.6 (2), p.2846-2853
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Yue, Ibrahim, Anas, Jenkins, Mary E., Naish, Michael D., Trejos, Ana Luisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The advent of wearable technology has enabled a large number of externally worn mechatronic devices to be developed and tested on people with movement disorders. The complexity of these disorders and the variety of conditions across different patients have resulted in a pressing demand for the incorporation of intelligent control systems, especially for a wearable tremor suppression device (WTSD) that can suppress tremor without impeding the user's voluntary motion. Several devices have been developed to reduce tremor; however, the evaluations of these devices have only been done in a controlled lab setting, while the functionality and ability to avoid user injury under the effect of disturbances during daily use have not been investigated. In this study, the performance of a WTSD was tested with several commonly used tremor suppression control systems, i.e., Weight-frequency Fourier Linear Combiner (WFLC), Bandlimited Multiple Fourier Linear Combiner, and enhanced High-order WFLC-based Kalman Filter, on a bench-top tremor simulator. These systems were also tested under the influence of three simulated disturbances that are commonly seen in real life, i.e., data mutation, sensor drift, and measurement loss. The experimental evaluation showed that none of these systems are safe under the disturbances. The tremor power suppression ratio (67.8%-94.2%) of the WTSD was not significantly lowered by the disturbances; however, the error when tracking voluntary motion significantly increased by 8.8^\circ-93.6^\circ, which may present a safety hazard to the users. The results of this study emphasize the importance of integrating safety measures into intelligent WTSDs.
ISSN:2377-3766
2377-3766
DOI:10.1109/LRA.2021.3062592