Study of Shielding Ratio of Cylindrical Ferrite Enclosure With Gaps and Holes

A stable magnetic field environment is one of the key factors to realize the ultrasensitive magnetic field detection. Ferrite materials, which possess both high electrical resistivity and high permeability, are ideal magnetic shielding materials. Gaps and holes usually exist in the large size magnet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE sensors journal 2019-08, Vol.19 (15), p.6085-6092
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Danyue, Ding, Ming, Lu, Jixi, Yao, Han, Zhao, Junpeng, Yang, Ke, Cai, Jiashu, Han, Bangcheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A stable magnetic field environment is one of the key factors to realize the ultrasensitive magnetic field detection. Ferrite materials, which possess both high electrical resistivity and high permeability, are ideal magnetic shielding materials. Gaps and holes usually exist in the large size magnetic shield which effects shielding effectiveness. In this paper, the variation of the DC magnetic shielding ratio, for different gaps and access hole dimensions, is quantificationally investigated using the finite element method. The shielding ratio in the simulation is close to the theoretical calculation for the closed shield when the thickness of gaps is very small. Our study indicates that gaps and holes separately reduced the shielding effectiveness, and the coexistence of gaps and holes aggravated the reduction of shielding effectiveness. Compared with the shielding ratio of the ferrite enclosure without gaps and holes for the known size shield, the transverse and longitudinal direction of the shielding ratio increase by 9% and 274% with gaps (thickness = 0.1 mm) and holes (diameter = 25 mm), respectively. The simulation results are partially verified with experimentally using a cylindrical ferrite shield made of Zn 0.17 Mn 0.74 Fe 2.06 O 4 and Zn 0.33 Mn 0.58 Fe 2.06 O 4 . The difference between the experimental and simulation results is less than 10%.
ISSN:1530-437X
1558-1748
DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2904719