Uncertainty in Photoconductance Measurements of the Emitter Saturation Current
We determine uncertainty in photoconductance (PC) measurements of the emitter saturation current density (J 0e ). A Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the impact of uncertainty from the input parameters including the test equipment calibration, the intrinsic-recombination model, and the measure...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE journal of photovoltaics 2013-10, Vol.3 (4), p.1200-1207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We determine uncertainty in photoconductance (PC) measurements of the emitter saturation current density (J 0e ). A Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the impact of uncertainty from the input parameters including the test equipment calibration, the intrinsic-recombination model, and the measured sample's thickness, doping, and optics. The uncertainty in the measurement of J 0e is calculated, where we find that the sensitivity to input uncertainty depends on the measurement mode, transient decay, or quasi-steady-state PC. For quasi-steady-state measurements, the uncertainty in J 0e is largely affected by thickness and generation uncertainty. For transient measurements, thickness uncertainty dominates the uncertainty in J 0e . The wafer doping and measured voltage data has little impact on the resultant J 0e uncertainty. We find, in our case study, that measurements of J 0e to be accurate within 3%-6% when using the transient mode, and 4%-7% using the quasi-steady-state mode. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2156-3381 2156-3403 |
DOI: | 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270346 |