Uncertainty in Photoconductance Measurements of the Emitter Saturation Current

We determine uncertainty in photoconductance (PC) measurements of the emitter saturation current density (J 0e ). A Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the impact of uncertainty from the input parameters including the test equipment calibration, the intrinsic-recombination model, and the measure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE journal of photovoltaics 2013-10, Vol.3 (4), p.1200-1207
Hauptverfasser: Thomson, Andrew F., Hameiri, Ziv, Grant, Nicholas E., Price, Chris J., Yan Di, Spurgin, Jack
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We determine uncertainty in photoconductance (PC) measurements of the emitter saturation current density (J 0e ). A Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the impact of uncertainty from the input parameters including the test equipment calibration, the intrinsic-recombination model, and the measured sample's thickness, doping, and optics. The uncertainty in the measurement of J 0e is calculated, where we find that the sensitivity to input uncertainty depends on the measurement mode, transient decay, or quasi-steady-state PC. For quasi-steady-state measurements, the uncertainty in J 0e is largely affected by thickness and generation uncertainty. For transient measurements, thickness uncertainty dominates the uncertainty in J 0e . The wafer doping and measured voltage data has little impact on the resultant J 0e uncertainty. We find, in our case study, that measurements of J 0e to be accurate within 3%-6% when using the transient mode, and 4%-7% using the quasi-steady-state mode.
ISSN:2156-3381
2156-3403
DOI:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270346