mmHRV: Contactless Heart Rate Variability Monitoring Using Millimeter-Wave Radio

Heart rate variability (HRV), which measures the fluctuation of heartbeat intervals, has been considered as an important indicator for general health evaluation. To alleviate the user burden and explore the usability for long-term health monitoring, noncontact methods for HRV monitoring have drawn t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE internet of things journal 2021-11, Vol.8 (22), p.16623-16636
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Fengyu, Zeng, Xiaolu, Wu, Chenshu, Wang, Beibei, Liu, K.J. Ray
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Heart rate variability (HRV), which measures the fluctuation of heartbeat intervals, has been considered as an important indicator for general health evaluation. To alleviate the user burden and explore the usability for long-term health monitoring, noncontact methods for HRV monitoring have drawn tremendous attention. In this article, we present mmHRV, the first contact-free multiuser HRV monitoring system using commercial millimeter-wave (mmWave) radio. The design of mmHRV consists of two key components. First, we develop a calibration-free target detector to identify each user's location. Second, a heartbeat signal extractor is devised, which can optimize the decomposition of the phase of the channel information modulated by the chest movement and, thus, estimate the heartbeat signal. The exact time of heartbeats is estimated by finding the peak location of the heartbeat signal while the interbeat intervals (IBIs) can be further derived for evaluating the HRV metrics of each target. We evaluate the system performance and the impact of different settings, including the distance between human and the device, user orientation, incidental angle, and blockage. Experimental results show that mmHRV can measure the HRV accurately with a median IBI estimation error of 28 ms (with respect to 96.16% accuracy). In addition, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) measured in the nonline-of-sight (NLOS) scenarios is 31.71 ms based on the experiments with 11 participants. The performance of the multiuser scenario is slightly degraded compared with the single-user case; however, the median error of the 3-user case is within 52 ms for all three tested locations.
ISSN:2327-4662
2327-4662
DOI:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3075167