Comparison between the magnetization obtained from Faraday balance and VSM or SQUID
The authors derive a relation between the magnetization obtained using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) or a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer and the magnetization obtained using a Faraday balance (FB). It is shown that, to a first approximation, the magnetizatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on magnetics 1992-09, Vol.28 (5), p.2453-2455 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2455 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 2453 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on magnetics |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Dababneh, M. Odeh, I. El-Ali, A. Ayoub, N.Y. |
| description | The authors derive a relation between the magnetization obtained using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) or a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer and the magnetization obtained using a Faraday balance (FB). It is shown that, to a first approximation, the magnetization obtained using a FB should be very close to those obtained using VSM or SQUID, especially for short samples and low field. The variation of the magnetization with the sample length is presented at low and intermediate fields.< > |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/20.179523 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_20_179523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>179523</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28185828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d91bfca1b1184c5b848e9820b88e5a098df9044ae3749b4a2de339703c1709953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUh4MoOKcHr55yEMFDNWnTNTnKdDqYiMx5LS_pq0baZiYdMv96Myd69fTj8b738fgRcszZBedMXaYxC5Wn2Q4ZcCV4wthI7ZIBY1wmSozEPjkI4S2OIudsQOZj1y7B2-A6qrH_QOxo_4q0hZcOe_sJvY0bp3uwHVa09q6lE_BQwZpqaKAzSKGr6PP8njpP54-L6fUh2auhCXj0k0OymNw8je-S2cPtdHw1S0yqij6pFNe1Aa45l8LkWgqJSqZMS4k5MCWrWjEhALNCKC0grTDLVMEywwumVJ4NydnWu_TufYWhL1sbDDbxK3SrUKZSRmeh_gFymctURvB8CxrvQvBYl0tvW_DrkrNy02-ZxvzuN7KnP1IIBpraxy5s-D0QOZNKbJ482WIWEf90W8cXVZSAZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28185828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between the magnetization obtained from Faraday balance and VSM or SQUID</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Dababneh, M. ; Odeh, I. ; El-Ali, A. ; Ayoub, N.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dababneh, M. ; Odeh, I. ; El-Ali, A. ; Ayoub, N.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors derive a relation between the magnetization obtained using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) or a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer and the magnetization obtained using a Faraday balance (FB). It is shown that, to a first approximation, the magnetization obtained using a FB should be very close to those obtained using VSM or SQUID, especially for short samples and low field. The variation of the magnetization with the sample length is presented at low and intermediate fields.< ></description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/20.179523</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMGAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; High temperature superconductors ; Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy ; Magnetic components, instruments and techniques ; Magnetic field measurement ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic materials ; Magnetic moments ; Magnetic separation ; Magnetization ; Physics ; Slabs ; SQUID magnetometers ; Superconducting magnets</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on magnetics, 1992-09, Vol.28 (5), p.2453-2455</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d91bfca1b1184c5b848e9820b88e5a098df9044ae3749b4a2de339703c1709953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/179523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,796,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/179523$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4508945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dababneh, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odeh, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Ali, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayoub, N.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between the magnetization obtained from Faraday balance and VSM or SQUID</title><title>IEEE transactions on magnetics</title><addtitle>TMAG</addtitle><description>The authors derive a relation between the magnetization obtained using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) or a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer and the magnetization obtained using a Faraday balance (FB). It is shown that, to a first approximation, the magnetization obtained using a FB should be very close to those obtained using VSM or SQUID, especially for short samples and low field. The variation of the magnetization with the sample length is presented at low and intermediate fields.< ></description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>High temperature superconductors</subject><subject>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</subject><subject>Magnetic components, instruments and techniques</subject><subject>Magnetic field measurement</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic materials</subject><subject>Magnetic moments</subject><subject>Magnetic separation</subject><subject>Magnetization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Slabs</subject><subject>SQUID magnetometers</subject><subject>Superconducting magnets</subject><issn>0018-9464</issn><issn>1941-0069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUh4MoOKcHr55yEMFDNWnTNTnKdDqYiMx5LS_pq0baZiYdMv96Myd69fTj8b738fgRcszZBedMXaYxC5Wn2Q4ZcCV4wthI7ZIBY1wmSozEPjkI4S2OIudsQOZj1y7B2-A6qrH_QOxo_4q0hZcOe_sJvY0bp3uwHVa09q6lE_BQwZpqaKAzSKGr6PP8njpP54-L6fUh2auhCXj0k0OymNw8je-S2cPtdHw1S0yqij6pFNe1Aa45l8LkWgqJSqZMS4k5MCWrWjEhALNCKC0grTDLVMEywwumVJ4NydnWu_TufYWhL1sbDDbxK3SrUKZSRmeh_gFymctURvB8CxrvQvBYl0tvW_DrkrNy02-ZxvzuN7KnP1IIBpraxy5s-D0QOZNKbJ482WIWEf90W8cXVZSAZQ</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Dababneh, M.</creator><creator>Odeh, I.</creator><creator>El-Ali, A.</creator><creator>Ayoub, N.Y.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7U5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>Comparison between the magnetization obtained from Faraday balance and VSM or SQUID</title><author>Dababneh, M. ; Odeh, I. ; El-Ali, A. ; Ayoub, N.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-d91bfca1b1184c5b848e9820b88e5a098df9044ae3749b4a2de339703c1709953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>High temperature superconductors</topic><topic>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</topic><topic>Magnetic components, instruments and techniques</topic><topic>Magnetic field measurement</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic materials</topic><topic>Magnetic moments</topic><topic>Magnetic separation</topic><topic>Magnetization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Slabs</topic><topic>SQUID magnetometers</topic><topic>Superconducting magnets</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dababneh, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odeh, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Ali, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayoub, N.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on magnetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dababneh, M.</au><au>Odeh, I.</au><au>El-Ali, A.</au><au>Ayoub, N.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between the magnetization obtained from Faraday balance and VSM or SQUID</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on magnetics</jtitle><stitle>TMAG</stitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2453</spage><epage>2455</epage><pages>2453-2455</pages><issn>0018-9464</issn><eissn>1941-0069</eissn><coden>IEMGAQ</coden><abstract>The authors derive a relation between the magnetization obtained using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) or a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer and the magnetization obtained using a Faraday balance (FB). It is shown that, to a first approximation, the magnetization obtained using a FB should be very close to those obtained using VSM or SQUID, especially for short samples and low field. The variation of the magnetization with the sample length is presented at low and intermediate fields.< ></abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/20.179523</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-9464 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on magnetics, 1992-09, Vol.28 (5), p.2453-2455 |
| issn | 0018-9464 1941-0069 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1109_20_179523 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Exact sciences and technology High temperature superconductors Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Magnetic components, instruments and techniques Magnetic field measurement Magnetic fields Magnetic materials Magnetic moments Magnetic separation Magnetization Physics Slabs SQUID magnetometers Superconducting magnets |
| title | Comparison between the magnetization obtained from Faraday balance and VSM or SQUID |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A46%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20the%20magnetization%20obtained%20from%20Faraday%20balance%20and%20VSM%20or%20SQUID&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20magnetics&rft.au=Dababneh,%20M.&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2453&rft.epage=2455&rft.pages=2453-2455&rft.issn=0018-9464&rft.eissn=1941-0069&rft.coden=IEMGAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/20.179523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28185828%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28185828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=179523&rfr_iscdi=true |