Intellectual capital reporting by the New Zealand local government sector

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assess the extent and quality of intellectual capital disclosures (ICDs) in the annual reports of the New Zealand local government sector.Design methodology approach - This paper makes use of an ICD index constructed through a participatory stakeholder consu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual capital 2008-01, Vol.9 (3), p.456-486
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, Annika, Samkin, Grant
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assess the extent and quality of intellectual capital disclosures (ICDs) in the annual reports of the New Zealand local government sector.Design methodology approach - This paper makes use of an ICD index constructed through a participatory stakeholder consultation process to develop a disclosure index which measures the extent and quality intellectual capital reporting in the 2004 2005 annual reports of 82 local government authorities in New Zealand. The final index comprised 26 items divided into three categories: internal, external and human capital.Findings - The results indicate that the reporting of intellectual capital by local government authorities is varied. The most reported items were joint ventures business collaborations and management processes, while the least reported items were intellectual property and licensing agreements. The most reported category of intellectual capital was internal capital, followed by external capital. Human capital was the least reported category.Research limitations implications - There are a number of limitations associated with this study. First the research covered only one year (2004 2005) which makes it difficult to draw any trend conclusions. Second, differing legal reporting requirements may make it difficult to compare findings of this research with findings of research conducted in other jurisdictions. The final limitation of this study is its exploratory nature of this research and the use of a disclosure index to measure disclosure levels.Practical implications - The results in this paper indicate that local authorities are disclosing some aspects of intellectual capital in their annual reports. However, there is no consistent reporting framework and many areas of ICDs do not meet stakeholder expectations.Originality value - This paper is unique in that it is the first study to make use of an ICD index to examine intellectual capital reporting by local government authorities.
ISSN:1469-1930
1758-7468
DOI:10.1108/14691930810892036