Isolation and detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in clinical stool samples using conventional and molecular methods

1 National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, MN, Canada 2 Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J2, Canada 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Correspondence Linda Chui L.Chui{at}provlab.ab.ca Received November...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical microbiology 2009-07, Vol.58 (7), p.905-911
Hauptverfasser: Gilmour, Matthew W, Chui, Linda, Chiu, Theodore, Tracz, Dobryan M, Hagedorn, Kathryn, Tschetter, Lorelee, Tabor, Helen, Ng, Lai King, Louie, Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1 National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, MN, Canada 2 Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J2, Canada 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Correspondence Linda Chui L.Chui{at}provlab.ab.ca Received November 1, 2008 Accepted April 3, 2009 The isolation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) other than serogroup O157 from clinical stool samples is problematic due to the lack of differential phenotypic characteristics from non-pathogenic E. coli . The development of molecular reagents capable of identifying both toxin and serogroup-specific genetic determinants holds promise for a more comprehensive characterization of stool samples and isolation of STEC strains. In this study, 876 stool samples from paediatric patients with gastroenteritis were screened for STEC using a cytotoxicity assay, commercial immunoassay and a conventional PCR targeting Shiga-toxin determinants. In addition, routine culture methods for isolating O157 STEC were also performed. The screening assays identified 45 stools presumptively containing STEC, and using non-differential culture techniques a total of 20 O157 and 22 non-O157 strains were isolated. These included STEC serotypes O157 : H7, O26 : H11, O121 : H19, O26 : NM, O103 : H2, O111 : NM, O115 : H18, O121 : NM, O145 : NM, O177 : NM and O5 : NM. Notably, multiple STEC serotypes were isolated from two clinical stool samples (yielding O157 : H7 and O26 : H11, or O157 : H7 and O103 : H2 isolates). These data were compared to molecular serogroup profiles determined directly from the stool enrichment cultures using a LUX real-time PCR assay targeting the O157 fimbrial gene lpfA , a microsphere suspension array targeting allelic variants of espZ and a gnd -based molecular O-antigen serogrouping method. The genetic profile of individual stool cultures indicated that the espZ microsphere array and lpfA real-time PCR assay could accurately predict the presence and provide preliminary typing for the STEC strains present in clinical samples. The gnd -based molecular serogrouping method provided additional corroborative evidence of serogroup identities. This toolbox of molecular methods provided robust detection capabilities for STEC in clinical stool samples, including co-infection of multiple serogroups.
ISSN:0022-2615
1473-5644
DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.007732-0