Distributional profiles of homologous open reading frames among bacterial phyla: implications for vertical and lateral transmission
M. A. Ragan and R. L. Charlebois Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia If open reading frames (ORFs) have been transmitted primarily by vertical descent, the distributional profile of orthologues of each ORF should be congruent with the organ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2002-05, Vol.52 (3), p.777-787 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | M. A. Ragan and R. L. Charlebois
Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
If open reading frames (ORFs) have been transmitted primarily by vertical
descent, the distributional profile of orthologues of each ORF should be
congruent with the organismal tree or a subtree thereof. Distributional
patterns not reconciled parsimoniously with tree-like descent and loss are
prima facie evidence of lateral gene transfer. Herein, a rigorous criterion
for recognizing ORF distributions is described and implemented; it does not
require the inference of phylogenetic trees, nor does it assume any
specific tree. Because lineage-specific differences in rates of sequence
change can also generate unexpected distributional patterns, rate artefacts
were controlled for by requiring pairwise matches between ORFs to exceed a
rigorous inclusion threshold, but absence of a match was assessed against a
more-permissive exclusion threshold. Applying this dual-threshold criterion
to cross-domain and cross-phylum distributional patterns for ORFs in 23
bacterial genomes, a relative abundance of ORFs was observed that find a
match in exactly seven other bacterial phyla; 94--99% of these ORFs also
find matches among the Archaea and/or Eukarya. In the larger (and some
smaller) bacterial genomes, ORFs that find matches in exactly one other
bacterial phylum are also relatively abundant, but fewer of these have
non-bacterial homologues; most of their matches within the Bacteria are to
the Proteobacteria and/or Firmicutes, which cannot be sister lineages to
all bacteria. ORFs that are neither distributed universally among the
Bacteria, nor necessarily shared with topologically adjacent lineages, are
preferentially enriched in large bacterial genomes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1466-5026 1466-5034 |
DOI: | 10.1099/ijs.0.02026-0 |