Cytogenetics and Evolutionary Change Under Domestication [and Discussion]
Domesticated plants often show more striking variability at and below the species level than their wild relatives. Nevertheless, no unique processes have operated in crop plant evolution. The ultimate source of variation is mutation, which is then exposed to selection, natural or human. The directio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 1976-07, Vol.275 (936), p.55-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Domesticated plants often show more striking variability at and below the species level than their wild relatives. Nevertheless,
no unique processes have operated in crop plant evolution. The ultimate source of variation is mutation, which is then exposed
to selection, natural or human. The direction of human selection may change through time and can usually be inferred only
indirectly from archaeological artefacts. Where a crop is evolving in contact with its wild relatives, disruptive selection
may lead to simultaneous divergence of crop and weed races. The crop may then become genetically isolated by change in breeding
system, chromosome number or chromosome structure, though these processes are usually arrested short of total isolation or
speciation. In crops that are grown on a garden rather than field scale, reproduce asexually, or have a long generation time,
gene flow and disruptive selection are less significant, though human selection may be more intense. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0962-8436 0080-4622 1471-2970 2054-0280 |
DOI: | 10.1098/rstb.1976.0070 |