Numerical simulations of turbulent thermal convection with a free-slip upper boundary

In this paper, we report on direct numerical and large-eddy simulations of turbulent thermal convection without invoking the Oberbeck–Boussinesq approximation. The working medium is liquid water and we employ a free-slip upper boundary condition. This flow is a simplified model of thermal convection...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019-12, Vol.475 (2232), p.20190601
Hauptverfasser: Hay, W. A., Papalexandris, M. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, we report on direct numerical and large-eddy simulations of turbulent thermal convection without invoking the Oberbeck–Boussinesq approximation. The working medium is liquid water and we employ a free-slip upper boundary condition. This flow is a simplified model of thermal convection of water in a cavity heated from below with heat loss at its free surface. Analysis of the flow statistics suggests similarities in spatial structures to classical turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection but with turbulent fluctuations near the free-slip boundary. One important observation is the asymmetry in the thermal boundary layer heights at the lower and upper boundaries. Similarly, the budget of the turbulent kinetic energy shows different behaviour at the free-slip and at the lower wall. Interestingly, the work of the mean pressure is dominant due to the hydrostatic component of the mean-pressure gradient but also depends on the density fluctuations which are small but, critically, non-zero. As expected the boundary-layer heights decrease with the Rayleigh number, due to increased turbulence intensity. However, independent of the Rayleigh number, the height of the thermal boundary layer at the upper boundary is always smaller than that on the lower wall.
ISSN:1364-5021
1471-2946
DOI:10.1098/rspa.2019.0601