Preliminary analysis of stimulation parameters for sacral neuromodulation in different indications: A multi-center retrospective cohort study from China
Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective approach for treating lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), and stimulation programming is essential for successful treatment. However, research on SNM programming for various indications is limited. Thus, we aimed to determine whether there were differ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2024-03 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective approach for treating lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), and stimulation programming is essential for successful treatment. However, research on SNM programming for various indications is limited. Thus, we aimed to determine whether there were differences in the stimulation parameters for different SNM indications and the appropriate programming recommendations.
Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with LUTD who underwent SNM and completed internal pulse generator (IPG) implantation. The parameters with the highest patient satisfaction or the most symptom improvement during the test period were considered optimal and used to set the programming after IPG implantation.
After screening, 282 patients were enrolled and categorized into four groups based on the following indications: refractory overactive bladder (OAB) (n=61), neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD) (n=162), interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/BPS) (n=24), and idiopathic non-obstructive urinary retention (NOUR) (n=35). When analyzing the optimal stimulus parameters, disparities in the stimulation amplitude and pulse frequency were noted among the four groups. The stimulation amplitude in the nLUTD group was higher than that in the idiopathic NOUR group (P=0.013). Differences in pulse frequency were observed between the refractory OAB and nLUTD groups (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1743-9159 1743-9159 |
DOI: | 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001302 |