Survival of Densely Packed Follicular Unit Grafts Using the Lateral Slit Technique

BACKGROUNDThe use of densely packed follicular unit grafts (>30 grafts/cm) is a highly debated issue, with some claiming decreased survival rates. Those who perform dense packing routinely do not believe they have seen any impaired survival. However, no prior study has rigorously analyzed densely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatologic surgery 2008-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1016-1022
Hauptverfasser: NAKATSUI, THOMAS, WONG, JERRY, GROOT, DON
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDThe use of densely packed follicular unit grafts (>30 grafts/cm) is a highly debated issue, with some claiming decreased survival rates. Those who perform dense packing routinely do not believe they have seen any impaired survival. However, no prior study has rigorously analyzed densely packed areas to assess survival rates. OBJECTIVEIn this study, the authors assessed the survivability of densely packed (>70 grafts/cm) follicular unit grafts using the lateral slit technique. METHODSThis study was a strictly observational study in one patient. Several 1-cm areas tattooed on the mid scalp were grafted at densities ranging from 23 to 72 grafts/cm using the lateral slit technique. The area surrounding the observation sites was transplanted at a density of 30 to 40 grafts/cm. RESULTSExamination of the most densely packed area (72 grafts/cm) at 8 months posttransplant revealed that the number of implanted grafts showing growth was 98.6% whereas the least densely transplanted area (23 grafts/cm) revealed a growth rate of 95.6%. CONCLUSIONThis is the first study that demonstrates high growth rates in densely packed follicular units using the lateral slit technique, even at densities of 72 grafts/cm. These data are in contradistinction to previously performed studies using older methodologies.
ISSN:1076-0512
1524-4725
DOI:10.1097/00042728-200808000-00005