Is there still a role for percutaneous stone removal in the age of lithotripsy?

The introduction of shock-wave lithotripsy has radically changed the treatment strategy for the management of most renal calculi. However, many stones cannot be treated effectively with this form of lithotripsy, and are best managed with percutaneous procedures. Although shock-wave lithotripsy is th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in urology 1996-07, Vol.6 (4), p.213-217
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Todd D, Preminger, Glenn M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The introduction of shock-wave lithotripsy has radically changed the treatment strategy for the management of most renal calculi. However, many stones cannot be treated effectively with this form of lithotripsy, and are best managed with percutaneous procedures. Although shock-wave lithotripsy is the least invasive form of stone management, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy remains the treatment of choice for several forms of stone disease includinglarge stones, many cystine and struvite calculi, lower pole calyceal calculi, stones associated with anomalous renal anatomy, and stones in morbidly obese patients.
ISSN:0963-0643
1473-6586
DOI:10.1097/00042307-199607000-00010