Children's Speech Recognition in Noise Using Omni-Directional and Dual-Microphone Hearing Aid Technology
OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. DESIGN:Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr-olds)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ear and hearing 1999-02, Vol.20 (1), p.1-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
DESIGN:Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr-olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; rangemild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0°; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180°. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual-microphone ("Audio Zoom") conditions.
RESULTS:Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ("younger" and "older") were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children.
CONCLUSIONS:Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-0202 1538-4667 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00003446-199902000-00001 |