Children's Speech Recognition in Noise Using Omni-Directional and Dual-Microphone Hearing Aid Technology

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. DESIGN:Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr-olds)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 1999-02, Vol.20 (1), p.1-11
Hauptverfasser: Gravel, Judith S, Fausel, Nancy, Liskow, Christine, Chobot, Janie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. DESIGN:Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr-olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB HL; rangemild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0°; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180°. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual-microphone ("Audio Zoom") conditions. RESULTS:Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ("younger" and "older") were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children. CONCLUSIONS:Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.
ISSN:0196-0202
1538-4667
DOI:10.1097/00003446-199902000-00001