Cochlear Nerve Action Potentials during Cerebellopontine Angle Surgery: Relationship of Latency, Amplitude, and Threshold Measurements to Hearing

The cochlear nerve action potential (AP) was monitored during two types of hearing preservation surgery(1) removal of small cerebellopontine angle tumors and (2) retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section. The purpose of this investigation was to study the relationship between changes in intraoperat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 1989-02, Vol.10 (1), p.22-28
Hauptverfasser: Stanton, Susan G, Cashman, Marlene Z, Harrison, Robert V, Nedrelski, Julian M, Rowed, David W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The cochlear nerve action potential (AP) was monitored during two types of hearing preservation surgery(1) removal of small cerebellopontine angle tumors and (2) retrolabyrinthine vestibular nerve section. The purpose of this investigation was to study the relationship between changes in intraoperative AP latency, amplitude, and threshold, and changes in audiometric hearing subsequent to surgery. The presence or absence of a cochlear nerve AP toward the end of surgery accurately predicted the presence or absence of postoperative hearing (93%). Regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between audiometric pre- and postoperative thresholds and intraoperative AP threshold changes. Statistically significant relationships were found for (1) pre-operative audiometric thresholds and initial AP click thresholds (p = 0.0068); (2) final AP click thresholds and postoperative audiometric thresholds (p = 0.0003); (3) AP click (p = 0.0001) and 1 kHz (p = 0.0006) threshold shifts and pre-to postoperative audiometric threshold shifts. No relatiohship was found between either AP latency or amplitude values and postoperative hearing. Intraoperative threshold measurements can be used as an indicator of hearing change. If amplitude or latency indices are also monitored it may be better to use stimulus levels close to the evoked potential threshold.
ISSN:0196-0202
1538-4667
DOI:10.1097/00003446-198902000-00004