A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents

A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents

Extensive remediation was conducted on contaminated landscapes after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011. A comparison is made of a range of different features relevant to each accident including the characteristics of the contamination and the landscapes affect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2017-04, Vol.173 (1-3), p.170
Hauptverfasser: Howard, Brenda J, Fesenko, Sergey, Balonov, Mikhail, Pröhl, Gerhard, Nakayama, Shinichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 170
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 173
creator Howard, Brenda J
Fesenko, Sergey
Balonov, Mikhail
Pröhl, Gerhard
Nakayama, Shinichi
description Extensive remediation was conducted on contaminated landscapes after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011. A comparison is made of a range of different features relevant to each accident including the characteristics of the contamination and the landscapes affected, the radiological criteria, the designation of areas to be remediated and the remediation measures adopted.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncw376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncw376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27886996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c169t-5bc2e17bd8062ce76ceb6131151963cc818f41a212406d3f2fa68f9db413b2b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AGSa6EuJ0nT9LJUp8JgIPO65JNGt7YkHbJ_b2Xq1csLD4fzPgjdAnkAUrJlHOyyM1-sEGdoDgWnGeNEnKM5Ac4zySmZoauUPgihRZnzSzSjhZSiLMUcbSpc9_tBxZD6Dvcev7m9s0GNYaqVH13E29bhunWx6_Vxh1Vn8erweUht2Cv8qEIwbcCVMcG6bkzX6MKrXXI3v7lA76unbf2SrTfPr3W1zgyIcsxybaiDQltJBDWuEMZpAQwgh1IwYyRIz0FRoNMSyzz1SkhfWs2BaapztkD3p7sm9ilF55shTg_FYwOk-bHSTFaak5UJvjvBw0FP6_7RPw3sG11UXjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Howard, Brenda J ; Fesenko, Sergey ; Balonov, Mikhail ; Pröhl, Gerhard ; Nakayama, Shinichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, Brenda J ; Fesenko, Sergey ; Balonov, Mikhail ; Pröhl, Gerhard ; Nakayama, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><description>Extensive remediation was conducted on contaminated landscapes after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011. A comparison is made of a range of different features relevant to each accident including the characteristics of the contamination and the landscapes affected, the radiological criteria, the designation of areas to be remediated and the remediation measures adopted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27886996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2017-04, Vol.173 (1-3), p.170</ispartof><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c169t-5bc2e17bd8062ce76ceb6131151963cc818f41a212406d3f2fa68f9db413b2b53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886996$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, Brenda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fesenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balonov, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pröhl, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>Extensive remediation was conducted on contaminated landscapes after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011. A comparison is made of a range of different features relevant to each accident including the characteristics of the contamination and the landscapes affected, the radiological criteria, the designation of areas to be remediated and the remediation measures adopted.</description><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AGSa6EuJ0nT9LJUp8JgIPO65JNGt7YkHbJ_b2Xq1csLD4fzPgjdAnkAUrJlHOyyM1-sEGdoDgWnGeNEnKM5Ac4zySmZoauUPgihRZnzSzSjhZSiLMUcbSpc9_tBxZD6Dvcev7m9s0GNYaqVH13E29bhunWx6_Vxh1Vn8erweUht2Cv8qEIwbcCVMcG6bkzX6MKrXXI3v7lA76unbf2SrTfPr3W1zgyIcsxybaiDQltJBDWuEMZpAQwgh1IwYyRIz0FRoNMSyzz1SkhfWs2BaapztkD3p7sm9ilF55shTg_FYwOk-bHSTFaak5UJvjvBw0FP6_7RPw3sG11UXjc</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Howard, Brenda J</creator><creator>Fesenko, Sergey</creator><creator>Balonov, Mikhail</creator><creator>Pröhl, Gerhard</creator><creator>Nakayama, Shinichi</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents</title><author>Howard, Brenda J ; Fesenko, Sergey ; Balonov, Mikhail ; Pröhl, Gerhard ; Nakayama, Shinichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c169t-5bc2e17bd8062ce76ceb6131151963cc818f41a212406d3f2fa68f9db413b2b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, Brenda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fesenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balonov, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pröhl, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, Brenda J</au><au>Fesenko, Sergey</au><au>Balonov, Mikhail</au><au>Pröhl, Gerhard</au><au>Nakayama, Shinichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>170</spage><pages>170-</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>Extensive remediation was conducted on contaminated landscapes after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011. A comparison is made of a range of different features relevant to each accident including the characteristics of the contamination and the landscapes affected, the radiological criteria, the designation of areas to be remediated and the remediation measures adopted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>27886996</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncw376</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2017-04, Vol.173 (1-3), p.170
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_rpd_ncw376
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T02%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Remediation%20After%20The%20Chernobyl%20and%20Fukushima%20Daiichi%20Accidents&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Howard,%20Brenda%20J&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=170&rft.pages=170-&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncw376&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E27886996%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27886996&rfr_iscdi=true