P265 Current UK wide use of the BASMI outcome measure in axial spondyloarthritis: an AStretch survey
Abstract Background/Aims The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is used in the monitoring of those living with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); it is the recommended and validated measure of movement in this patient group. As a physical outcome measure its use has been challenging d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2022-04, Vol.61 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background/Aims
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is used in the monitoring of those living with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); it is the recommended and validated measure of movement in this patient group. As a physical outcome measure its use has been challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to assess the current application of the BASMI in axSpA services across the UK.
Methods
A survey was devised to explore when the BASMI is used, by whom and the reasons for its use. The AStretch committee reviewed and re-drafted the questions. The survey was shared across multiple platforms and email professional distribution lists, and was open 2nd-12th October 2021.
Results
74 UK healthcare professionals completed the survey. It is mostly physiotherapists who undertake the BASMI (69%); some other clinicians also measure: nurses (10%), medics (9%), physiotherapy support workers (10%), healthcare support workers (2%). Confidence in performing the BASMI averaged at 3.5/5. The majority of respondents record the BASMI in the electronic record (73%); app-based solutions are developing (7%) and paper-only recording diminishing (20%). When asked about frequency, most respondents (73%) recorded “it depends”, implying that the BASMI is used on an individual patient basis. Table 1 presents data with regards to why the BASMI is undertaken, scored by participant ranking, and free text responses about reasons for use.
P265 Table 1:
Participant ranking score summation for “reason to use the BASMI” and free text “reasons for use of the BASMI”
Item
Overall Rank
Total Score *
For all newly diagnosed patients
1
555
To help us devise a bespoke exercise plan
2
513
To address poor movement or function
3
498
To address/encourage adherence to exercise/advice
4
451
It’s part of their on-going management
5
391
Delay to diagnosis affecting start of treatment and therefore movement restrictions apparent
6
356
Guidelines suggest yearly monitoring
7
332
As an outcome measure pre- and post-hydrotherapy
8
295
To address an increase in pain levels
9
277
For patient preference
10
265
Rheumatology team asked for it
11
202
For research purposes/as a part of a clinical trial
12
155
*Score is a weighted calculation. Items ranked first are valued higher than the following ranks, the score is a sum of all weighted rank counts.
FREE TEXT REASONS FOR THE USE OF THE BASMI
Helpful to patients to objectively understand their movement. Newly diagnosed |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-0324 1462-0332 |
DOI: | 10.1093/rheumatology/keac133.264 |