P265 Current UK wide use of the BASMI outcome measure in axial spondyloarthritis: an AStretch survey

Abstract Background/Aims The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is used in the monitoring of those living with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); it is the recommended and validated measure of movement in this patient group. As a physical outcome measure its use has been challenging d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2022-04, Vol.61 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Weight, Kate, Gregory, William J, Chambers, Hannah, Clarke, Emily, Daly, Matthew, Davie, Alasdair, Elkins, Jenny C, Gaikwad, Susimala, Harrison, Heather, Longton, Clare, Martin, Melanie, Motion, Maureen, Voules, Sue, McDonald, Marie Therese, Jeffries, Claire
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background/Aims The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is used in the monitoring of those living with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); it is the recommended and validated measure of movement in this patient group. As a physical outcome measure its use has been challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to assess the current application of the BASMI in axSpA services across the UK. Methods A survey was devised to explore when the BASMI is used, by whom and the reasons for its use. The AStretch committee reviewed and re-drafted the questions. The survey was shared across multiple platforms and email professional distribution lists, and was open 2nd-12th October 2021. Results 74 UK healthcare professionals completed the survey. It is mostly physiotherapists who undertake the BASMI (69%); some other clinicians also measure: nurses (10%), medics (9%), physiotherapy support workers (10%), healthcare support workers (2%). Confidence in performing the BASMI averaged at 3.5/5. The majority of respondents record the BASMI in the electronic record (73%); app-based solutions are developing (7%) and paper-only recording diminishing (20%). When asked about frequency, most respondents (73%) recorded “it depends”, implying that the BASMI is used on an individual patient basis. Table 1 presents data with regards to why the BASMI is undertaken, scored by participant ranking, and free text responses about reasons for use. P265 Table 1: Participant ranking score summation for “reason to use the BASMI” and free text “reasons for use of the BASMI” Item Overall Rank Total Score * For all newly diagnosed patients 1 555 To help us devise a bespoke exercise plan 2 513 To address poor movement or function 3 498 To address/encourage adherence to exercise/advice 4 451 It’s part of their on-going management 5 391 Delay to diagnosis affecting start of treatment and therefore movement restrictions apparent 6 356 Guidelines suggest yearly monitoring 7 332 As an outcome measure pre- and post-hydrotherapy 8 295 To address an increase in pain levels 9 277 For patient preference 10 265 Rheumatology team asked for it 11 202 For research purposes/as a part of a clinical trial 12 155 *Score is a weighted calculation. Items ranked first are valued higher than the following ranks, the score is a sum of all weighted rank counts. FREE TEXT REASONS FOR THE USE OF THE BASMI Helpful to patients to objectively understand their movement. Newly diagnosed
ISSN:1462-0324
1462-0332
DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keac133.264