P091 Who do we risk leaving behind? A survey of digital access and e-health literacy in people with inflammatory conditions

Abstract Background/Aims The COVID-19 pandemic led to an overnight shift in healthcare delivery and rapid uptake of digital technology. Such approaches risk digital exclusion for people without access to or not confident in their use of technology. We sought to examine digital access and e-health li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2022-04, Vol.61 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Hider, Samantha, Muller, Sara, Gray, Lauren, Manning, Fay, Brooks, Mike, Heining, Dominic, Menon, Ajit, Packham, Jonathan, Raghuvanshi, Subhra, Roddy, Edward, Ryan, Sarah, Scott, Ian, Paskins, Zoe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background/Aims The COVID-19 pandemic led to an overnight shift in healthcare delivery and rapid uptake of digital technology. Such approaches risk digital exclusion for people without access to or not confident in their use of technology. We sought to examine digital access and e-health literacy in people with inflammatory conditions. Methods People (n = 2,024) were identified from their electronic health record and invited to participate in a survey, using SMS and postal approaches. Data were collected on age, gender, self-reported arthritis diagnosis (RA, PsA, AS, SLE and other), access to an internet-enabled device and frequency of internet access, health literacy (single-item literacy screener) and self-perceived e-health literacy (eHEALs). Ethical approval was obtained (Ref 21/PR/0867). Results 639 people completed the survey, of whom 287 (44.9%) completed it online. Mean (sd) age was 64.5 (13.1) years and 384 (64.7%) were female. 98.3% were white. Approximately 20% of people did not have access to an internet enabled device (Table). 93 (15.3%) of patients reported never accessing the internet, this proportion was higher in people with RA. Approximately 19% had low health literacy. In those reporting internet use, eHealth literacy was moderate. The most popular options for accessing arthritis advice were telephone helplines or appointments. P091 Table 1 N (%) unless otherwise stated RA (n = 492) Psoriatic Arthritis (n = 130) Axial SpA (n = 50) Total (n = 639) Age (years) mean (SD) 66.8 (12.5) 58.2 (12.6) 61.8 (12.5) 64.5 (13.1) Female 302 (65.9) 52 (43.7) 28 (59.6) 384 (64.7) Completed online 206 (41.9) 70 (53.6) 25 (50.0) 287 (44.9) Internet enabled device 366 (77.1) 105 (86.8) 39 (83.0) 486 (79.4) Frequency of internet access Never 82 (17.4) 10 (8.3) 7 (14.9) 93 (15.3) < 1 day/week 56 (11.9) 11 (9.1) 7 (14.9) 64 (10.5) 1-3 days/week 52 (11.0) 13 (10.7) 5 (10.6) 68 (11.2) 2-6 days/week 62 (13.1) 16 (13.2) 7 (14.9) 83 (13.6) Everyday 220 (46.6) 71 (58.7) 21 (44.7) 301 (49.4) Low health literacy 92 (19.6) 20 (16.5) 11 (23.9) 117 (19.3) eHEALS 31 (25, 33) 31 (26, 35.8) 29 (25.1, 33) 29.7 (7.2) Sources of arthritis advice Websites 121 (25.5) 45 (37.2) 14 (29.8) 176 (28.8) GP appointment 115 (24.2) 28 (23.1) 31 (31.9) 151 (24.7) Telephone advice line 216 (45.5) 62 (51.2) 26 (55.3) 286 (46.7) Rheumatology appointment 237 (49.9) 52 (43.0) 23 (48.9) 297 (48.5) Rheumatology email advice 45 (9.5) 19 (15.7) 4 (8.5) 66 (10.8) Conclusion Low health lite
ISSN:1462-0324
1462-0332
DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keac133.090