P026 Sugar rush: single-centre audit of screening and counselling for steroid-induced hyperglycaemia, based on the British Society for Rheumatology giant cell arteritis guideline
Abstract Background/Aims In patients starting steroids for giant cell arteritis (GCA), to evaluate adherence to BSR guideline: HbA1c monitoring, documentation of counselling, and detection of steroid-induced hyperglycaemia. Methods Data were gathered from the electronic medical records. Steroid-indu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rheumatology (Oxford, England) England), 2022-04, Vol.61 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background/Aims
In patients starting steroids for giant cell arteritis (GCA), to evaluate adherence to BSR guideline: HbA1c monitoring, documentation of counselling, and detection of steroid-induced hyperglycaemia.
Methods
Data were gathered from the electronic medical records. Steroid-induced hyperglycaemia was defined as new HbA1c >48 measured 3+ months after beginning steroid treatment. The data were presented at a regional meeting to raise awareness and encourage clinicians to incorporate counselling and monitoring into their practice, and a GCA clinic was set up. Practice was then re-evaluated.
Results
In the baseline dataset, 60 patients with GCA had a mean age of 72; 47 were female; mean body mass index (BMI) was 27 (for the 39/60 with a recorded height and weight). Mean initial dose of prednisolone was 45.9mg. The re-audit cohort were comparable with a mean age of 73.1; 19 females and mean BMI of 27 (for 15/30 with recorded). Mean initial prednisolone dose of 46.3mg. Baseline HbA1c was checked in 32/60 (53%) initially, and 28/30 (93%) on re-audit. 7/60 (12%) had documentation of counselling for steroid-induced hyperglycaemia initially, which increased to 9/30 (30%) on re-audit. Hyperglycaemia was detected in 8/60 (13%) of the initial audit group, compared to 11/30 (36%) in the re-audit. In the initial cohort, 3/10 (30%) of those with diabetes at baseline developed hyperglycaemia and 4/12 (33%) of those with pre-diabetes at baseline developed hyperglycaemia. In the re-audit, 7/9 (78%) of those with diabetes at baseline developed hyperglycaemia and 4/7 (57%) with pre-diabetes at baseline developed hyperglycaemia. Those who developed hyperglycaemia had a higher baseline weight and BMI (Table 1) in both the initial cohort and re-audit.
P026 Table 1
Initial cohort
Re-audit
Averages and percentages
Total pop.
Hyperglycaemia
No Hyperglycaemia
Total population
Hyper-glycaemia
No hyper- glycaemia
Total
60
8
52
30
11
19
Risk factors
Age
72.3
70.6
72.6
73.1
76.5
71.1
Gender Female, n (%)
47 (78%)
06 (75%)
41 (79%)
19 (63%)
7 (64%)
12 (63%)
Weight
72.1 (median = 71.7)
89.5 (median = 82.4)
70.8 (median = 70.1)
72.7 (median = 71.1)
77.5 (median = 75)
69.6 (median = 68.2)
BMI
27.0
29.8
26.6
27.5
31.3
25.6
HTN n (%)
27 (45%)
2 (25%)
25 (48.1%)
16 (53%)
6(54.5%)
10 (52.6%)
Smoker n (%)
15 (25%)
2 (25%)
13 (25%)
11 (36.7%)
3 (27.3%)
8 (42.1%)
Raised HbA1c n (%)
22 (36.7%)
6 (75%)
15 (28.8%)
13 (43.3%)
7 (63.6%)
6 (31.6%)
Fasting glucose raised n (%)
4 (1.7% |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-0324 1462-0332 |
DOI: | 10.1093/rheumatology/keac133.025 |