Antenatal Ultrasound Measurement of Fetal Abdominal Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness as a Predictor of Fetal Birth Weight

Abstract Objectives To correlate fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness (FASTT) measured by transabdominal ultrasound and birth weight measured immediately after delivery and to obtain cut-off values for FASTT to predict small and large for gestational age babies in the Egyptian population. B...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:QJM : An International Journal of Medicine 2024-10, Vol.117 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Shawky Abdeltawab Taha Shoeib, Sherouk Ahmed, Sakr, Hossam Moussa, Mohammed, Hesham Salah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives To correlate fetal abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness (FASTT) measured by transabdominal ultrasound and birth weight measured immediately after delivery and to obtain cut-off values for FASTT to predict small and large for gestational age babies in the Egyptian population. Background Fetal weight estimation is a crucial part of antenatal and intrapartum care as it forms the basis for decision making in obstetric care. Various studies compared the accuracy of different ultrasound fetal weight estimation formulas to determine the most accurate one, but current evidence still indicates significant error levels. FASTT measurement can be used to improve ultrasonographic fetal weight assessment reducing potential perinatal complications associated with small and large for gestational age fetuses. Patients and Methods A prospective cohort study conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals on 86 pregnant women with normal singleton pregnancies between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation. FASTT was measured in millimeters at the anterior third of the abdominal circumference and birth weight was recorded immediately after delivery. Results This study concluded that FASTT showed high statistically significant correlation with EFW by Hadlock formula IV (1985) (r = 0.624, p- value = 
ISSN:1460-2725
1460-2393
DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.967