Laminiria Tents versus Vaginal Prostaglandin in Cervical Ripening in Term Induction of Labor with Unfavorable Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background Mechanical methods used for induction of labor received a great attention nowadays due to the serious side effects of the pharmacological methods. Hygroscopic dilators are considered important subtype of these mechanical methods. One of them is Laminaria which is a synthetic type...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:QJM : An International Journal of Medicine 2024-10, Vol.117 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Mohamed, Ahmed Mohsen Hassan, Abou El Nour, Ayman Abdul Razek, El Sabaa, Haitham AbdelMohsen, Abdelrazek, Maya Mahmoud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Mechanical methods used for induction of labor received a great attention nowadays due to the serious side effects of the pharmacological methods. Hygroscopic dilators are considered important subtype of these mechanical methods. One of them is Laminaria which is a synthetic type of sea algae that induces cervical dilation by absorbing water from the cervix and gradually increasing in thickness. Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of Laminiria tents to intravaginal prostaglandins for cervical ripening in induction of labor at term gestation in women with unfavorable cervix. Methods A total of 90 pregnant women at term gestation with unfavorable cervix admitted to the labor ward for induction of labor at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, in the period from March 2022 to March 2023, were enrolled in the study and underwent assessment using Bishop score with monitoring differences between two groups in mode of delivery, time to enter active phase, time to delivery, changes in bishop score and noted complications. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with number (NCT06151925) Results In the present study we demonstrated that in laminaria group, there was 66.7% had NVD and 33.3% had CS while in prostaglandin group, there was 71.1% had NVD and 28.9% had CS in which there was no statistically significant difference between laminaria and prostaglandin groups regarding routes of delivery. In this study we demonstrated that Time needed to enter active phase (hours) in laminaria group was 16 (10 – 19) while in prostaglandin group was12 (8 – 16) in which there was a statistically significant difference between laminaria and prostaglandin groups regarding Time needed to enter active phase (hours) (p = 0.022). In this study we demonstrated that regarding induction delivery time (hours) in laminaria group was 20 (13 – 25) while in prostaglandin group was 16 (11 – 20) in which there was a statistically significant difference between laminaria and prostaglandin groups regarding induction delivery time (hours) (P = 0.036). Conclusion Vaginal prostaglandin is more effective than laminaria tent for ripening of cervix before induction and can decrease labor duration and time to delivery. However, for better results further studies with a larger sample size are recommended.
ISSN:1460-2725
1460-2393
DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.577