Evaluation of Neuronavigation Aided Surgery on Diffuse Brain Glioma

Abstract   Surgical management of Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas (DLGGs) has radically changed in the last years. Several studies now recommend maximal safe gross total, or even supratotal resection. There has been a change in basic assumptions from watchful waiting to early radical safe resection. Neuro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:QJM : An International Journal of Medicine 2024-10, Vol.117 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: ELArossi, Mohammed Osama, Ghobashy, Mohammed Ashraf, Abdelrihim, Hisham Anwar, Fayed, Zeiad Youssry Ibrahem, Hesham Elgayar, Abdelrahman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract   Surgical management of Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas (DLGGs) has radically changed in the last years. Several studies now recommend maximal safe gross total, or even supratotal resection. There has been a change in basic assumptions from watchful waiting to early radical safe resection. Neuronavigation guided diffuse low grade glioma resection is claimed by some authors to play a major role in improving the Extent Of surgical Resection (EOR) whilst decreasing complication rate. The aim: of this study was to evaluate the impact of neuronavigation use during DLGG resection and the surgical outcome. Materials and Methods Thirty one patients affected by DLGG were enrolled undergoing surgical resection with the aim of a maximal safe resectio n using a neuronavigation device with or without other functional, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological modalities. Statistical Analysis Continuous data were presented as ranges, mean and standard deviation (as appropriate), median and SEM (standard error of the mean when relevant). Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparative statistics was used for subgroup analysis evaluating different variables among different groups. Statistical significance was set at P value of 0.05. All statistical calculations were run using SPSS version 22. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical data, and chi-square tests were used for intergroup comparisons. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the differences in the percentage of deterioration of symptoms between groups. Univariate and Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to analyze the effect of NN on EOR and the deterioration of symptoms, respectively. Kaplan-Meier was used to compare the difference in survival between groups. Univariate and Multivariate Cox regressions were used to determine the relationship between the assistance of NN and survival. The statistically significant was set as a p 
ISSN:1460-2725
1460-2393
DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.569