Efficacy of fish oil and its components in the management of psoriasis: a systematic review of 18 randomized controlled trials

Abstract Context Fish oil and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs) have anti-inflammatory properties, but their effect on psoriasis and its comorbidities remains inconclusive. Objective The aim of this quantitative systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fish oil and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition reviews 2020-10, Vol.78 (10), p.827-840
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Xi, Hong, Seokgyeong, Sun, Xiaoying, Xu, Wenbin, Li, Hongjin, Ma, Tian, Zheng, Qi, Zhao, Huaibo, Zhou, Yaqiong, Qiang, Yan, Li, Bin, Li, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Context Fish oil and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs) have anti-inflammatory properties, but their effect on psoriasis and its comorbidities remains inconclusive. Objective The aim of this quantitative systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fish oil and its components in the treatment of psoriasis and its comorbidities. Data Sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China Network Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to March 30, 2019. Study Selection Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if they measured the effect of fish oil and its components in the treatment of patients with psoriasis. Data Extraction Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 927 study participants were included. Results Monotherapy with fish oil or ω-3 PUFAs had no effect on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (P = 0.47), lesion area (P = 0.34), or pruritus (P = 0.62). Fish oil or ω-3 PUFAs combined with conventional treatments, however, resulted in a decreased PASI score (mean difference [MD], −3.92; 95%CI, −6.15 to −1.69; P = 0.0006) and lesion area (MD, −30.00; 95%CI, −33.82 to −26.18; P 
ISSN:0029-6643
1753-4887
DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuz098