P17.18.B Augmentative craniotomy in recurrent glioblastoma. Preliminary clinical and radiological outcomes
Abstract Background The compression of peritumoral healthy tissue in brain tumor patients is considered a major cause of life-threatening neurologic symptoms. This condition is associated with an increase in intracranial pressure. The literature reports that GBM has a mass effect in 72% of autoptic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2022-09, Vol.24 (Supplement_2), p.ii93-ii93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
The compression of peritumoral healthy tissue in brain tumor patients is considered a major cause of life-threatening neurologic symptoms. This condition is associated with an increase in intracranial pressure. The literature reports that GBM has a mass effect in 72% of autoptic brains of patients who died of brain tumor, with herniation in 50% of all cases.
Material and methods
We present a preliminary clinical series on 5 cases. The patients are chosen based on criteria of recurrent glioblastoma without the possibility of a gross total resection with a recurrence after STUPP protocol. The surgeries include cytoreduction and augmentative craniotomy. The aim is to increase the intracranial volume and reduce the intracranial pressure in evolving glioblastoma. Clinical and radiological follow-up considers different objective scales and contrast enhancement MRI performed every 3 months. We evaluate KPS, survival rate, complication rate, quality of life using QOL-BN20 and neuropsychological assessment.
Results
The 12 months of follow-up shows a mean survival rate of 9 months after the surgery. This procedure has no negative impact on the survival rate, complication rate, and quality of life reduction. The neuropsychological evaluation does not show an impact on self-perception of aesthetic appearance. The surgery does not show surgical wound complications. The mean operative time was 225 minutes and was comparable with standard recurrence glioblastoma procedure.
Conclusion
This work has the main limitation of being preliminary results on small population. However, these results show encouraging outcomes and could be an innovative and salvage therapy for recurrent and incurable glioblastoma. Further follow-up and study must be performed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-8517 1523-5866 |
DOI: | 10.1093/neuonc/noac174.326 |