2875 Experience in the use of plasmapheresis as a therapeutic tool in acute pathologies in a tertiary level hospital
Abstract Background and Aims Apheresis is a therapeutic modality which purpose is the elimination from plasma of the pathogenic components of a disease or its clinical manifestations. Plasmapheresis is an apheresis technique used in the treatment of various diseases with varying degrees of proven cl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2024-05, Vol.39 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background and Aims
Apheresis is a therapeutic modality which purpose is the elimination from plasma of the pathogenic components of a disease or its clinical manifestations. Plasmapheresis is an apheresis technique used in the treatment of various diseases with varying degrees of proven clinical efficacy. The aim of our work is to describe the experience in the use of plasmapheresis in different acute pathologies in our center, and if there are factors that favor the clinical response to treatment.
Method
Retrospective cohort study. We included plasmapheresis performed in the years 2017-2022. Variables such as age, sex, etiology, type of replacement performed, number of sessions, and American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) classification, among others, were collected. We defined response to treatment as partial or total clinical remission.
Results
We included 72 patients who received plasmapheresis during 2017-2022. Mean age 54 ± 18 years. 56.9% male. Disease etiology was neurological in 56.9%, nephrological in 36.1% and hematological in 6.9%. Between 2017-2019, 39.7% of the plasmapheresis were performed, while the remaining 60.3% were between 2020-2022. The number of sessions was 5.3 ± 2. 59.6% were performed with albumin, 29.2% with fresh frozen plasma and 13.9% with albumin and fresh frozen plasma. The ASFA indication was category I in 68.1%. 23.6% presented some complication, the most frequent being febrile in 6.9%, systemic infection and allergic reaction in 5.6%. A response to treatment was observed in 75%. Antibodies were positive before starting plasmapheresis in 29.2%, decreasing to 16.7% 3 months after treatment. There was recurrence in 19.4%, 16.7% received more cycles of plasmapheresis and there was 11.1% mortality due to disease. In patients with response to treatment, a higher percentage of response was observed in those diseases of non-nephrological origin (70.4% vs. 29.6%, p 0.04), lower percentage of complications (16.7% vs. 83.3%, p 0.01) and lower mortality associated with the disease (3.7% vs. 96.3%, p 0.001).
Conclusion
Plasmapheresis is a therapeutic plasma exchange technique that is increasingly used in our hospital, with a greater increase in recent years. It is a therapeutic option that should be considered in many occasions as first line or adjuvant treatment, with a low rate of complications and clinical improvement in most patients. Despite this, studies with a larger number of patients are required to increase and conso |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ndt/gfae069.1801 |