Uraemic symptoms, nutritional status and renal function in pre‐dialysis end‐stage renal failure patients
Background. Deciding on the right moment to initiate dialysis and finding the best method to establish this critical stage of chronic renal failure are both controversial issues. This study attempted to address this subject by correlating a uraemic score with the most common clinical methods for ass...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2001-04, Vol.16 (4), p.776-782 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background. Deciding on the right moment to initiate dialysis and finding the best method to establish this critical stage of chronic renal failure are both controversial issues. This study attempted to address this subject by correlating a uraemic score with the most common clinical methods for assessing renal function in pre‐dialysis chronic renal failure (end‐stage renal disease, ESRD) patients. Methods. The study group consisted of 201 non‐selected ESRD patients. A uraemic score, composed of the uraemic symptoms, the subjective global assessment of nutritional status, serum albumin concentration, and protein catabolic rate normalized for ideal body weight, was taken as a clinical marker of uraemic toxicity. Correlations that best fit this uraemic score with creatinine clearance (Ccr), the arithmetic mean of Ccr, urea clearance (Ccr‐Cu) and Kt/V urea were then investigated. Results. Thirty‐six per cent of patients had malnutrition. By multiple logistic regression analysis, the presence of comorbidity, Ccr‐Cu and haematocrit were the best determinants of malnutrition. The correlation that best fit Ccr or Ccr‐Cu with the uraemic score was a cubic curve (r=0.38, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ndt/16.4.776 |