Broad-lined type Ic supernova iPTF16asu: A challenge to all popular models

It is well known that ordinary supernovae (SNe) are powered by 56Ni cascade decay. Broad-lined type Ic SNe (SNe Ic-BL) are a subclass of SNe that are not all exclusively powered by 56Ni decay. It was suggested that some SNe Ic-BL are powered by magnetar spin-down. iPTF16asu is a peculiar broad-lined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2019-10, Vol.489 (1), p.1110-1119
Hauptverfasser: Wang, L J, Wang, X F, Cano, Z, Wang, S Q, Liu, L D, Dai, Z G, Deng, J S, Yu, H, Li, B, Song, L M, Qiu, Y L, Wei, J Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is well known that ordinary supernovae (SNe) are powered by 56Ni cascade decay. Broad-lined type Ic SNe (SNe Ic-BL) are a subclass of SNe that are not all exclusively powered by 56Ni decay. It was suggested that some SNe Ic-BL are powered by magnetar spin-down. iPTF16asu is a peculiar broad-lined type Ic supernova discovered by the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory. With a rest-frame rise time of only 4 d, iPTF16asu challenges the existing popular models, for example, the radioactive heating (56Ni-only) and the magnetar +56Ni models. Here we show that this rapid rise could be attributed to interaction between the SN ejecta and a pre-existing circumstellar medium ejected by the progenitor during its final stages of evolution, while the late-time light curve can be better explained by energy input from a rapidly spinning magnetar. This model is a natural extension to the previous magnetar model. The mass-loss rate of the progenitor and ejecta mass are consistent with a progenitor that experienced a common envelope evolution in a binary. An alternative model for the early rapid rise of the light curve is the cooling of a shock propagating into an extended envelope of the progenitor. It is difficult at this stage to tell which model (interaction+magnetar + 56Ni or cooling+magnetar + 56Ni) is better for iPTF16asu. However, it is worth noting that the inferred envelope mass in the cooling+magnetar + 56Ni is very high.
ISSN:0035-8711
1365-2966
DOI:10.1093/mnras/stz2184