372 Fusarium in a Burn Center: Lessons Learned

Abstract Introduction Fungal infections in burn patients are not uncommon related to large TBSA injuries, immunosuppression, and challenges with nutrition. In March of 2017, our burn center experienced a trend of positive quantitative wound cultures for Fusarium in four different patients. Here, we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of burn care & research 2019-03, Vol.40 (Supplement_1), p.S162-S163
Hauptverfasser: Gabehart, K, Roggy, D, Sood, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Fungal infections in burn patients are not uncommon related to large TBSA injuries, immunosuppression, and challenges with nutrition. In March of 2017, our burn center experienced a trend of positive quantitative wound cultures for Fusarium in four different patients. Here, we share our approach to this outbreak and the changes to our practice as a result of this incidence. Methods A multidisciplinary team to include medical leadership, nursing leadership, PT/OT, rehabilitation, EVS, quality/risk, facilities and infection control was formed to investigate. All four patients were cohorted in a closed environment on our burn unit and received 1:1 care until discharge. Through architectural design of our burn center we were able to remain open during this time to accept new patients. From March 20-April 11th the entire burn center was terminally cleaned to include all direct and indirect patient care areas. Air quality testing and surface testing was completed by an outside company to look for a Fusarium source. The team met daily to communicate progress and findings. All cleaning practices, infection control protocols and workflow processes were reviewed. Results All air quality and environmental surface cultures were negative for Fusarium and no firm source was identified. One consistent denominator was all operations were performed in the same room although on different days so energy around OR terminal cleaning and culturing was an initial focus. With a focus on wound as a primary source we evaluated our workflow practices as it related to wound cleansing, dressings, surface cleaning including beds, and overall contact of ancillary devices touching the wounds such as cables and splints. The financial impact was substantial totaling 1.3 million dollars. These charges include the room and board cost for the patient, increase in salaries paid due to the need for 1:1 care for four patients, and the environmental testing of the entire burn center. Three patients survived and one expired. All were treated systemically, topically and underwent serial debridements as necessary for source control. Conclusions Our leadership took a proactive approach to review practices and investigate processes as a result of this infectious outbreak. A variety of processes were reviewed and changed as a result of our review. These processes include but are not limited to: enhanced terminal and daily cleaning practices of patient rooms, equipment and operatin
ISSN:1559-047X
1559-0488
DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irz013.280