Simultaneous determination of residues of chloramphenicol, florfenicol, florfenicol amine, and thiamphenicol in shrimp tissue by gas chromatography with electron capture detection
A gas chromatographic (GC) method is presented for determining residues of chloramphenicol (CAP), florfenicol (FF), florfenicol amine (FFa), and thiamphenicol (TAP) in shrimp tissues, with meta-nitrochloramphenicol (mCAP) as the internal standard. The composited shrimp is extracted with basic ethyl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of AOAC International 2000, Vol.83 (1), p.26-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A gas chromatographic (GC) method is presented for determining residues of chloramphenicol (CAP), florfenicol (FF), florfenicol amine (FFa), and thiamphenicol (TAP) in shrimp tissues, with meta-nitrochloramphenicol (mCAP) as the internal standard. The composited shrimp is extracted with basic ethyl acetate, followed by an acetonitrile-basic ethyl acetate mixture. This extract is centrifuged, filtered, evaporated, and reconstituted in water; the reconstituted extract is acidified, defatted with hexane, and passed through a propylsulfonic acid (PRS) and C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) system. The C18 SPE column is eluted with methanol, and the PRS SPE column is eluted with basic MeOH plus counter ion. The combined eluates are evaporated, reconstituted in acetonitrile, and derivatized with Sylon BFT. After derivatization, the addition of toluene directly to the sample, followed by the addition of basic water, quenches the derivatization process. After centrifugation, the organic layer is carefully removed, and the analytes are determined by GC with electron capture detection. Shrimp tissues were fortified with fenicols (i.e., CAP, FF, FFa, and TAP) at 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 ng/mL. Overall recoveries were 88, 101, 91, and 84% with overall interassay (between-day) variabilities (i.e., relative standard deviations) of 5.3, 9.4, 12.8, and 7.4% for CAP, FF, FFa, and TAP, respectively. The method detection limits were calculated as 0.7, 1.4, 2.4, and 1.3 ng/g (ppb) for CAP, FF, FFa, and TAP, respectively, based on a 10 g sample. The quantitation limit as determined empirically by this method is the lower limit of the standard curve, which is about 5 ng/g (ppb) for each analyte. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1060-3271 1944-7922 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jaoac/83.1.26 |