P-239 Comparison of reproductive outcomes for cleavage- and blastocyst-stage frozen embryo transfer: A retrospective study

Abstract Study question Does blastocyst-stage (day 5-6) embryo transfer improve pregnancy and live birth rates per frozen transfer compared to cleavage-stage (day 2-3) embryo transfer? Summary answer Pregnancy rate is significantly higher following frozen blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, while live...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2023-06, Vol.38 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Finelli, R, Terribile, M, Wilding, M, Nargund, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study question Does blastocyst-stage (day 5-6) embryo transfer improve pregnancy and live birth rates per frozen transfer compared to cleavage-stage (day 2-3) embryo transfer? Summary answer Pregnancy rate is significantly higher following frozen blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, while live birth rate does not differ. What is known already The extended culture of cleavage-stage (day 2-3) embryos to blastocyst-stage (day 5-6) embryos has been largely adopted in recent years. In fact, blastocyst culture may allow a better selection of the embryo to be transferred based on its developmental history and morphological criteria, and result in a lower number of exceeded embryos to be frozen for storage. However, the literature comparing pregnancy and live birth rates for cleavage- and blastocyst-stage transfer remains contradictory, and the benefits of frozen blastocyst transfer is still under discussion. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study investigated couples having frozen embryo transfer at the cleavage (days 2 or 3) or the blastocyst-stage (days 5 or 6) at our clinic between 2014–2021. Results from more cycles were analyzed individually. We excluded cycles based on fresh embryo transfer, oocyte or sperm donation. Cycles were further sub-classified based on the type of treatment, as natural or stimulated, and the pregnancy and live birth rates were compared. Participants/materials, setting, methods Data was obtained from patient records at our fertility clinic and sorted by two authors. Variables included female age, treatment plan, the stage of the embryo transferred, and the report of pregnancy and live birth. Statistical analysis was conducted by using MedCalc Software, and Chi-squared test applied to compare the outcomes’ frequency based on the day of frozen embryo transfer. P 
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dead093.597