P–787 Impact of delaying ART to promote weight loss: a large multicentre study accounting for the combined effect of female/male age and body mass index (BMI)

Abstract Study question Is postponing the start of ART (to promote a reduction in female BMI) beneficial for cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) when accounting for the female/male ageing this delay will cause? Summary answer Postponing ART treatment in one year to promote female weight loss could be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2021-08, Vol.36 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Santos-Ribeiro, S, Rodrigues, M, Bellver, J, Jorge, C, Navarro, A, Garrido, N, Garcia-Velasco, J A, Rei. Soares, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study question Is postponing the start of ART (to promote a reduction in female BMI) beneficial for cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) when accounting for the female/male ageing this delay will cause? Summary answer Postponing ART treatment in one year to promote female weight loss could be detrimental in women of advanced maternal age (AMA, >35 years-old). What is known already Overweight/obese couples are frequently encouraged to lose weight prior to infertility treatment to enhance ART outcomes. However, a meaningful weight loss is often difficult to achieve for these couples, frequently taking at least one year to accomplish. Given that both female and male ageing are also important for ART success, we were interested in understanding the combined impact on CLBR of BMI reduction and ageing following a one-year delay. Study design, size, duration A retrospective study including patients performing their first ART cycle using autologous gametes between 2013–2018 in one of 39 participating ART centres. Only GnRH antagonist cycles were included (n = 14260). CLBR was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included time-to-pregnancy, birthweight and gestational age. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients were subdivided according to female BMI (Kg/m2) in either underweight (38 years-old, in which even extreme weight-loss did not compensate for the age-related reduction in CLBR caused by the one-year delay. Moreover, male weight-loss failed to provide any additional benefit when accounted for in the regression models. Finally, obesity was also associated with a modest but statistically significant one-month delay in time-to-pregnancy and a 96.1 g (95% confidenc
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deab130.786