P–428 Uterine infusion of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) before embryo transfer may improve the transfer outcomes in recurrent implantation failure and thin/scarred endometrium patients

Abstract Study question Does the infusion of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) to the uterus improve the outcomes of embryo transfer of thin endometrial or recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients? Summary answer Autologous PRP uterine infusion may improve the result of embryo transfer (ET)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2021-08, Vol.36 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Bach, H A, Vuong, V V H, Bach, T T C, Nguyen, Q H, Pham, V P, Nguyen, T N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study question Does the infusion of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) to the uterus improve the outcomes of embryo transfer of thin endometrial or recurrent implantation failure (RIF) patients? Summary answer Autologous PRP uterine infusion may improve the result of embryo transfer (ET) in RIF group and thin/scarred endometrial group. What is known already Autologous PRP has been proposed to improve the outcomes of various treatment procedures. In infertility, several trials have reported an improvement in endometrial thickness in patients having thin endometrium thus previously cancelled ET cycles. Uterine injection of PRP shortly before ET has been proposed to improve the results of ET in patients having RIF. Platelets in PRP would be activated via different pathways to release growth factors and cytokines. In this study, we applied our in-house-developed PRP extraction kits that use a mechanical activation/platelet breaking down method to infuse/inject into the uterine of the poor prognosis transfer patients. Study design, size, duration This study includes two phases: Phase 1 (04/2019–12/2019): we tested the safety and effectiveness of the PRP extraction kits in 30 volunteers regardless of the gender by derma-rolling process using PRP extracted by our kits. Phase 2 (02/2020–12/2020): 111 IVF patients who had thin/scarred endometrium previously having at least one cancelled ET cycle (group 1) or patients who had at least two implantation failure ETs (group 2) were enrolled in the study. Participants/materials, setting, methods 20 mL blood was drawn from the vein. After centrifugation, PRP was filtrated through a filter to break down platelets releasing growth factors/cytokines. Firstly, 30 volunteers (average age of 34.4 ± 5.5) were derma-rolled on the facial skin twice (one week apart). Secondly, IVF group 1 was uterine-infused with 0.5 mL PRP on day 7/8 of the ET cycle, both groups were uterine-infused with 0.5 mL PRP two days (40–48 hours) before ET. Main results and the role of chance 0.5 mL of PRP before filtering was measured and calculated to have 8–12 folds increase of platelet concentration. In phase 1, no side-effects or complications were recorded. The average skin pore size reduced by approximately 0.01 mm2 in all patients two weeks after treatment. In phase 2, the average age was 35.6 ± 6.1. Group 1 had 31 patients and group 2 had 99 ones. In group 1, five patient did not obtained improvement in endometrium then ET cycles were
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deab130.427