Clinical and seminal parameters associated with testicular microlithiasis and its severity in males from infertile couples
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is there an association of testicular microlithiasis (TM) and its severity with testicular dysfunction in men from infertile couples? SUMMARY ANSWER The presence of ≥5 testis microcalcifications per sonogram at the scrotal ultrasonography (US) of infertile males was associate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2021-03, Vol.36 (4), p.891-898 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Is there an association of testicular microlithiasis (TM) and its severity with testicular dysfunction in men from infertile couples?
SUMMARY ANSWER
The presence of ≥5 testis microcalcifications per sonogram at the scrotal ultrasonography (US) of infertile males was associated with a more severe testicular dysfunction as compared to males with limited, or without, TM.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
TM, representing an incidental finding in the scrotal US, is associated with male infertility and a higher risk for testicular cancer as compared to that in infertile males without TM. Still, there are unresolved questions on the relation between TM severity and testicular dysfunction in infertile men, as well as on the identification of risk factors for TM.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This study was an observational, retrospective, case-control investigation involving males who underwent clinical evaluation, measurement of reproductive hormones, seminal analysis and scrotal US as part of diagnostic work-up for couple infertility at an andrology clinic, between January 2004 and December 2018. One hundred patients, out of the 2112 scored men, were found to have TM during the US evaluation. One hundred male partners from 100 infertile couples without TM, comprising the control group, were selected through a matched analysis by age and date of evaluation to reduce the confounding effect of both age and technique variability all along the long period of observation.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
TM was defined as limited TM (LTM) or classical TM (CTM), when the maximum number of hyperecogenic spots per sonogram was |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/deaa354 |