Pearl Index study with levonorgestrel-releasing intravaginal rings: using pharmacokinetic results to investigate treatment compliance as a potential contributor for contraceptive failure

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the reason for insufficient contraceptive efficacy of levonorgestrel (LNG) delivered by intravaginal ring (IVR) releasing comparable amounts of LNG as approved progestogen-only pills (POPs)? SUMMARY ANSWER The pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation in a subpopulation indicated that the steady-state concentration of plasma LNG was markedly lower in the participants in the USA compared to those in Japan suggesting non-compliance in the US participants which may explain a clearly higher Pearl Index (PI) in USA (8.2, unadjusted PI) compared to Japan (1.4, unadjusted PI). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Contraceptive efficacy of LNG in POPs has been demonstrated following different routes of administration (e.g. orally, implants, intrauterine systems), and the PK is well-characterized including a target exposure needed for contraception. Exposure above this target concentration was reached in Phase 1 studies using IVR delivering 40 µg LNG per day. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The primary objective of this multicenter, open-label, single-arm study conducted in the USA and in Japan was to assess the contraceptive efficacy of an LNG-containing IVR during a planned treatment period of 1 year in healthy women 18–35 years of age. The study was planned to be conducted in 1600 participants (1300 in the USA, 300 in Japan). The study was prematurely terminated after approximately one-third of the planned exposure was reached due to a high number of pregnancies (28) in the US study population. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In total, 1471 participants were treated (1166 participants in the USA and 305 participants in Japan). The PI as a measure of contraceptive efficacy was calculated from the frequency of unintended pregnancies during treatment. LNG exposure in the systemic circulation was assessed during treatment in 136 participants (PK subgroups: 106 in the USA and 30 in Japan). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The PK evaluation in the PK subgroups indicated that the steady-state concentration of plasma LNG after 6 months was markedly lower in the participants in the USA (geometric mean 91.2 ng/l) compared to those in Japan (263.8 ng/l). This PK finding cannot be explained by the regional differences in body weight observed between the PK subgroups, thus suggesting non-compliance in the US participants. In 15.7% of the samples collected in the USA and 3.5% samples in Japan, the LNG concentration at steady state was below the lower limit of