P2483Differential effects of novel antidiabetics on arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abstract Background Arterial stiffness flags increased cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. There is limited data on how novel anti-diabetic agents affect arterial stiffness. Purpose To investigate the effects of novel anti-diabetic agents on arterial stiffness in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
Arterial stiffness flags increased cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. There is limited data on how novel anti-diabetic agents affect arterial stiffness.
Purpose
To investigate the effects of novel anti-diabetic agents on arterial stiffness in T2DM patients.
Patients and methods
We enrolled 64 consecutive patients under stable antidiabetic therapy who did not achieve therapeutic targets. Subjects were assessed to receive an additional antidiabetic agent to optimize glucose control; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i, n=14), glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA, n=21), sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i, n=21) or long-acting insulin (n=8). Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as well as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Alx) were measured (as indices of arterial stiffness) were measured at baseline and 3 months after treatment intensification.
Results
There were no differences between the study groups in traditional risk factors, or baseline HbA1c, PWV and Alx levels (p=NS for all). All groups achieved better glycemic control in terms of HbA1c values between baseline and follow-up (for DPP4i: 7.4±0.2% vs 6.7±0.2%, for GLP1RA: 8.3±0.2% vs 6.9±0.1%, for SGLT2i: 7.5±0.1% vs 6.7±0.1% and for insulin 9.8±0.5% vs 7.7±0.4%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0813 |