P1727Prognosis predictors of patients with initial cardiogenic shock complicated acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intense antiplatelet therapy. PRAGUE-18 shock substudy

Abstract Background Early reperfusion of the infarct related artery is the only treatment improving prognosis of patients with initial cardiogenic shock (CGS) complicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Killip class IV at admission). Purpose The analysis focused on subgroup of patients with initi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Hlinomaz, O, Motovska, Z, Knot, J, Miklik, R, Hromadka, M, Varvarovsky, I, Dusek, J, Jarkovsky, J, Tousek, F, Majtan, B, Simek, S, Branny, M, Svoboda, M, Widimsky, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Early reperfusion of the infarct related artery is the only treatment improving prognosis of patients with initial cardiogenic shock (CGS) complicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (Killip class IV at admission). Purpose The analysis focused on subgroup of patients with initial CGS randomized into the multicenter PRAGUE-18 study (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in primary PCI). Methods In the PRAGUE-18 study, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1230) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were immediately randomized to prasugrel or ticagrelor with intended treatment duration of 12 months. 53.6% (n=659) switched to clopidogrel after discharge. Major ischemic and bleeding events were followed throughout the entire study period. Beside standard laboratory tests, efficacy of ticagrelor and prasugrel was measured by flow cytometric VASP evaluation in patients selected for a laboratory sub-study (n=218). Acute heart failure (KILLIP >1) was present in 11.8%, and 46 patients (3.7%) randomized to the study were in CGS. Results Patients with CGS were older [66.7 (48,3; 83,3) years] than those without CGS (KILLIP
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0482