P621Variation of global longitudinal strain (2D STE) with passive leg lifting maneuver: a marker of myocardial functional reserve?
Abstract Introduction In a normal heart, the passive leg lifting maneuver (LLM) will result in an increase in myocardial contractility, according to the mechanistic concept of the Frank-Starling law. With the progression of myocardial disease this ability is impaired and the myocardial functional re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Introduction
In a normal heart, the passive leg lifting maneuver (LLM) will result in an increase in myocardial contractility, according to the mechanistic concept of the Frank-Starling law. With the progression of myocardial disease this ability is impaired and the myocardial functional reserve (mFR) is reduced (Figure1 – Panel A). The variation of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (as an index of contractile function) with LLM may thus represent a marker of left ventricular mFR.
Purpose
To assess the variation of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) with LLM as a marker of mFR in a healthy population and in patients with myocardial disease (hypertrophic myocardiopathy - HCM and systolic dysfunction patients – SystDysf.
Methods and results
We evaluated the variation of LV GLS by 2-dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (2D-STE), in response to passive LLM, in a population of 103 individuals (54 healthy individuals, 28 HCM patients and 21 left ventricular SystDysf patients). Clinical, demographic and echocardiographic parameters (including LV longitudinal mechanics obtained with 2D-STE before and after LLM) were described. The population had a mean age of 46±18 years and 55% were women. Increased venous return to the heart during LLM was confirmed by an increase in the maximal diameter of the inferior vena cava (15,1±3,6 vs 20,6±3,8 mm, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0229 |