87Effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on adverse cardiac remodelling after acute myocardial infarction - Results of the CHIARA MIA 2 trial
Abstract Introduction Adverse cardiac remodelling represents the most important risk factor for the development of heart failure (HF) after myocardial infarction (MI). Chymase is a protease that generates locally pro-fibrotic factors such as angiotensin II, TGFβ, and matrixmetallproteases that contr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Introduction
Adverse cardiac remodelling represents the most important risk factor for the development of heart failure (HF) after myocardial infarction (MI). Chymase is a protease that generates locally pro-fibrotic factors such as angiotensin II, TGFβ, and matrixmetallproteases that contribute to tissue remodelling.
Purpose
This phase IIa study examined the effects of the chymase inhibitor fulacimstat on functional parameters of adverse cardiac remodelling after acute MI.
Methods
A double-blind, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed in patients after first STEMI who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24h of symptom onset. To enrich for patients at risk of adverse remodelling, main inclusion criteria were a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤45% and an infarct size>10% on day 5 to 9 post MI as measured by cardiac MRI. On day 6 to 12 post MI, patients were randomized to treatment with either 25 mg fulacimstat (n=54) or placebo (n=53) twice daily on top of standard of care. The changes in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LVESVI from baseline to 6 months of treatment were analyzed by a central blinded cardiac MRI core laboratory.
Results
Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated, 64.8% of patients treated with fulacimstat and 75.5% of patients treated with placebo reported treatment emergent adverse events. Fulacimstat achieved exposures that were approximately 10-fold higher than those predicted to be required for minimal therapeutic activity. After six months of treatment, there were no effects of fulacimstat compared to placebo on the changes in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LVESVI (see Table).
Analysis of primary efficacy parameters
Parameter
Placebo
Fulacimstat
p-value
LVEF (%)
baseline
37.2±6.1
39.1±5.5
0.15
6 months
41.2±8.4
42.6±8.4
0.45
delta
4.0±5.0
3.5±5.4
0.69
LVEDVI (mL/m2)
baseline
80.0±17.1
77.4±18.2
0.51
6 months
85.1±19.1
84.7±23.4
0.94
delta
5.1±18.9
7.3±13.3
0.54
LVESVI (mL/m2)
baseline
50.5±13.0
47.3±12.3
0.26
6 months
51.1±16.9
49.6±18.1
0.71
delta
0.6±14.8
2.3±11.2
0.56
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation.
Conclusion
Fulacimstat was safe and well tolerated in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction (LVD) after first STEMI but had no effect on adverse cardiac remodelling in the experimental setting of this study.
Acknowledgement/Funding
The study was funded by its sponsor BAYER AG |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0017 |