P5646Risk factor paradox in STEMI-related sudden cardiac arrest

Abstract Background Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is currently the most feared complication of STEMI. The impact of CVRF on the rate of SCA is still unkno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Karam, N, Bataille, S, Marijon, E, Loyeau, A, Tafflet, M, Lamhaut, L, Pires, V, Boche, T, Dupas, F, Le Bail, G, Allonneau, A, Juliard, J M, Lapostolle, F, Lambert, Y, Jouven, X
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is currently the most feared complication of STEMI. The impact of CVRF on the rate of SCA is still unknown. Purpose To assess the association between CVRF and pre-hospital SCA during acute STEMI. Methods Data were taken between 2006 and 2014 from the e-MUST study that enrolls all STEMI managed by EMS in the Greater Paris Area, including those dead before hospital admission. Characteristics of patients who presented SCA were compared to those of patients who did not, and multivariable logistic regression was developed including all variables that differed between the two groups, in order to identify characteristics associated with an increased risk of SCA. Results Over the study period, 13,253 STEMI patients were included (median age 60.1 [51.4 - 73.0], 78.1% males). Among them, 7,513 patients (58.1%) had ≥2 CVRF, 3,979 (30.8%) had 1 CVRF, and 1,432 (11.1%) did not present any CVRF. Pre-hospital SCA witnessed by emergency medical services occurred in 749 (5.6%) patients. SCA victims were younger compared to the non-SCA group (58.0 vs. 60.3 years (P
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0589